Monday, December 8, 2014

My Closing Thoughts and Final Blog

Faith Vietti
Week 14
December 8, 2014
LTEC 642


Herein lie my closing thoughts on what has been truly an enjoyable learning adventure into the world of social media. Admittedly, I came into this course reluctantly, mainly because of my concern for privacy and sharing information publicly. Another reason was that I was uncertain of the value of what I would learn. However in retrospect, I do see the value and benefit of “authentic learning through collaboration”.


As this course has been primarily centered on collaboration and authentic learning pedagogical principles, each tool learned and collaboration has furthered my respect and appreciation for the new technologies adopted and the collaborative learning that took place with online group activities.

While in the thick of things, I wasn’t able to see personal development or growth so clearly. Now, taking a step back, to look reflectively at where I started and where I am at the conclusion of this program, tells me that much was achieved.

The highlights for me began the first week with the personal introductions. This was the first time for me to use an online tool such as Animoto. It was also the first time for me to create a multimedia object where I would cut, splice and edit a video segment, and drop it into an online tool. The reading for that week that was of particular benefit was the journal article by Kristin Sherman, How social media changes our thinking and learning. And indeed it has done just that, “it has changed my thinking and learning.”

The outcomes from the collaborative learning activities, which provided authentic tasks, did lead to deeper learning, and higher levels of cognition.  It was of interest to me that those with whom I collaborated in week 4 on the topic of multitasking, lead me to understand that many of us do multitask. However, the question we pondered was how effective are we at multitasking. It was a lively and memorable dialogue, one that I appreciated; which lead me to the conclusion that everyone in the learning activity had a propensity toward doing a number of things at one time. One case in point was The TCCfx Mini-Conference. It was insightful and more than I expected it would be; however, trying to multitask and use Twitter to tweet while listening to speakers was quite the task.

Other highlights were Content curation, building a Twitter network and building social capital with Pinterest and Storify. Throughout the online learning process, I least enjoyed blogging; not because I dislike writing, rather, much of the time it seemed to be linear communication without much interaction. Without active and engaging discussion, I felt I was merely writing for the sake of writing in a vacuum. 

What I enjoyed the most was our collectively coming together on Mondays through Blackboard Collaborative. It was such a wonderful way to hear the voices and thoughts of others. Through it all, I increased my knowledge, was able to use the Web 2.0 tools and apply it to real-life situations. 

Priceless. 

References


Sherman, K. (2013). How social media changes our thinking and learning. The Language Teacher, 37(4). Retrieved from jalt-publications.org/files/pdf-article/37.4tlt_plenary3.pdf

Monday, November 17, 2014

FACETS- Find, Assess, Choose, Explain, Tailor, and Share

FACETS- Find, Assess, Choose, Explain, Tailor, and Share
Week 12
November 17, 2014
           
           I have to admit that much of social media and in particular, social media curation, was uncharted water for me prior to this course. On an experimental basis, I decided to go through Listly to find, assess, choose, explain, tailor and share content that was of personal interest to me. For that reason, I began to search for anything related to Sardinia, Italy. This was a useful exercise to give Listly a trial run before trying to find content on mindmapping.
            What I first encountered was a tremendous sum of information out there on the subject of Italy, and more specifically Sardinia. It was initially overwhelming. It brought to the forefront how much effort goes into finding and filtering. Finding quality resources was a challenge. There were many sites, articles, and videos that I sifted through, which were more about promoting a service or product versus education on the region, culture, arts, music, or history. Since I thoroughly love the topic of travel, and more importantly travel to a place I have never been such as Sardinia, it was more of a pleasure than a pain.  This is what Beth’s blog referred to as being one of the biggest challenges in becoming a content curator—getting past the feeling of “content fried” or so much good content with so little time to digest it. For me this was the latter and not so much the former.  She contends that there are techniques to use that can minimize our feeling of being distracted. I’ve yet to acquire the discipline to make it easier and flow.

            In short, this experience of curating content has lead me through the process of finding, assessing, choosing, explaining, tailoring, and at last sharing on both Facebook and Twitter. Now I’m ready to tackle being a Content Curator for Mindmapping.

Click on link to see more…
 Sardinia, Italy

Monday, November 10, 2014

Social Capital: It’s Not Who You Know, It’s How You Know Them

Week 11

Social Capital: It’s Not Who You Know, It’s How You Know Them

November 10, 2014

         In the article, It’s Not Who You Know, It’s How You Know Them, suggests “giving support is strongly associated with getting it” and that this is the key to reciprocation. Reciprocation often comes “in kind but sometimes with other forms of support.” [Plickert et al]. Reciprocity is described as “doing for others if they have done for you- a key way people mobilize resources to deal with daily life and seize the opportunities.” [Plickert et al]. These exchanges are central to obtaining network capital: social capital that is embedded in interpersonal relations that can provide custom-tailored helpful resources that flexible, efficient and effective.” [Lin, 2001, 2005]. Even though, the question to raise here is “where does reciprocity come from, and how much value have I gained by interacting with other learners online?

         First to address is “where does reciprocity come from?” Reciprocity comes from a simple notion of doing to others as I would have them do to me. This is the Golden Rule: “if I give you X, you would give me X back, either because of normative pressure or out of self-interest.” [Plickert et al].

         So what is “X”? In an online course, it of course could be the emotional support and camaraderie that comes from the social interaction in shared projects, or breakout discussions on given topics, or even dialogue that ensues outside the parameters of the online course environment.

         Second, this leads to what I have gained by interacting with other learners online. The value gained derives from a collective sharing and caring. Sharing of one’s ideas, skills in navigating uncharted waters of new technology, empathy and understanding that foster further learning and acceptance of new Web 2.0 tools.

         Over time, I believe social capital is raised through such relationships that can develop into strong ties, which continue to increase the likelihood of reciprocal exchange. In sum, it is the similarities between network members that can foster support. [Plickert et al].

         A final thought.
         In the words of Mikhail Bakunin, “No person can recognize or realize his or her own humanity except by recognizing it in others and so cooperating for its realization by each and all.  


References

Lin, N., 2001. Building a network theory of social capital. In: Ron, B. (Ed.), Social Capital: Theory and Research.  Aldine de Gruyter Inc., New York.
Lin, N., 2005. A network theory of social capital. In: Wolleb, G. (Ed.), Forthcoming in Handbook on Social Capital.
Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Plickert. G, Wellman, B. & Côté, R. (2007). It’s not who you know, it’s how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom.

Saturday, November 8, 2014

Week 10: Mapping Twitter Topic Networks:
From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters

Political conversations on Twitter: The Aftermath of the Elections

By Faith Vietti
November 6, 2014

            While I am not fond of political conversations in any form, I did see how polarized crowds and community clusters formed during and after the November 4th elections in the U.S. through the use of Twitter. The polarized crowd network structure fell into one dominant archetype, which is best described as polarized crowds of Democrats and Republicans. These “two big and dense groups have little connection between themselves, and engage in highly divisive and heated political subjects.” Even though the heated topics between Democrats and Republicans are many, the main outcome of the November 4, 2014 election was that of the Democrats losing the senate to the Republicans. Twitter and tweets were telling and used by these polarized communities to carry their campaign messages.
           
            Prior to the election, the Democrats tweeted their campaign slogans to motivate constituents with emotive language to move them to action.
“The Democrats tweet: @TheDemocrats Don’t forget what we’re fighting for. Vote for Democrats tomorrow: pollingplaces.democrats.org”
However, what followed the November 4th election was a sense of defeat among the democrats having lost the senate to the Republicans. In response to the monumental loss, tweets for “hope” emerged.




Democratic community cluster
The role of the Democratic community cluster ignored the Republicans and used different web sources with different hashtags. To illustrate, a message from Chair Wasserman Schultz emerged stating that the Democrats “Got to do better. Focus, review, and press forward. The tweets:
 The Democrats @TheDemocrats   No one wants to repeat Tuesday night - @DWStweets wants you to join the conversation on our midterm strategy: bit.ly/1zCTPoT

#grateful MT @TheDemocrats: The fight for progress is never easy, but nothing worth fighting    for ever is. Thank you

  @DWStweets @TheDemocrats they ran a gutless and spineless campaign and refused to       acknowledge the accomplishments of this president
 The US is moving left despite Republican gains— by @saletan via @Slate       http://read.bi/1tNfaau 

Republican community clusters
The Republican community clusters followed in suite as they ignored the Democrats while speaking to their party views on what transpired on November 4th while using different web sources with different hashtags.
The Midterm Results: "The political momentum in Washington clearly is with a resurgent Republican Party." http://ow.ly/E0PpZ 
CFR follows
We need all hands on deck for 2016.Dear Democratic Party: Make No Mistake About It, Republicans Didn’t Win – You Lost http://www.forwardprogressives.com/dear-democratic-party-make-mistake-republicans-didnt-win-lost/ …
Here's what a Republican takeover looks like: http://trib.al/1ez6o1M 

Republican Election Victory Seen as Positive for Business, but Others Temper Expectations http://nyti.ms/1y4agqc Expand

Republican have gained control over the U.S. Senate. What this means for education: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2014/11/republicans_will_control_senate.html?cmp=soc-edit-tw … #edpolitics

According to @dbrauer the highest percentage of votes for Republican @Jeff4Gov (30.6%) in #mpls came from the #UMN's frat row. #Election2014

AACC's SVP of gov relations, David Baime in @insidehighered's What a GOP-Led Congress Means for Higher Ed: http://bit.ly/1wxtWVa Washington Post follows


Voice of America - Republican Control of Congress Could Force Changes in US Foreign Policy http://bit.ly/1uwaUit  

The 2014 electorate wasn't just older and whiter than 2012. It also voted more Republican. http://wapo.st/1y3MSZQ 


            In short, what the political conversations on Twitter showed us in the aftermath of the


elections is as Pew Research indicated, and that is “if a topic is political, it is common to see two separate, polarized crowds take shape.” And of course, we did through the “conversations on Twitter by the Democrats and the Republicans that created networks with identifiable contours as people replied to and mentioned one another in their tweets.”